In
today’s journal, I would like to discuss about Queer film along with the movie Billy’s Hollywood Screen Kiss. Through
this paper we can know more about the elements in Queer film, and so can be
differentiated from types of film.
:::QUEER CINEMA:::
For decades, Queer cinema has been existed but without a
name yet. It was identified with avant-garde cinema, and it is a concept that
re-examined and reviewed the image of homosexuality. In 1991, Queer Cinema was
introduced at Toronto Film Festival as a concept. Since then, films have
re-evaluated subjectivities, male gazes and so on; by incorporating the
question of pleasure on screen and the celebration of excess, resulting in a
subversion of previously considered mainstream genres. The evolution of Queer
Cinema is more visible only in the 1990s with the global traumatizing effects
of AIDS. At the same time, it is also known as the New Queer Cinema, in which
such films have become a remarkable commodity and very much an identifiable
movement. Also, New Queer Cinema is a term used to describe the renaissance of
gay and lesbian filmmaking by the Americans. Gus Van Sant is known as the
leader for such cinema with the contributions My Own Private Idaho (1991) and Even
Cowgirls Get The Blues (1993).
New
Queer Cinema is not a single aesthetic but a collection, taking pride in
difference. However, it is a male homosexual cinema that focuses on male
desires. Lesbianism remains quite invisible, resulting in an inequality of
funding for lesbian filmmakers. In the Queer theory, it challenges and pushes
further debates on gender and sexuality, formally proposed by Feminist Theory,
and as a critical response to the numerous discourses surrounding AIDS and
homosexuality. There are four types of approaches in Queer Theory as well.
Firstly, in the audience reception, Queer Cinema assesses popular cultural
texts that overtly address non-straight audiences, such as the homosexual
characters in a narrative film. Second, it contain texts that address straight
audiences but have gotten appreciations from non-straight audiences. Third,
Doty (1998) stated, “to describe straight-identifying film and popular culture
theorist, critics, or producers that is concerned with non-normative
straightness”. Fourth, films and popular culture texts, spectator positions,
pleasures, and readings that articulate spaces outside gender binaries and
sexuality categories, whether these are outside normative straight
understanding of gender and sexuality or outside the orthodox lesbian and gay
understandings. To conclude the theory discussion, Queer Cinema ascribes value
to homosexuality and lesbianism, be it good or bad. New Queer Cinema revamps
previously heterosexually-confined voices, sexuality and genres. Both of these
engage audiences to connect to the queer or queerly contexts, across racial,
cultural and societal boundaries. To talk about the key aesthetics for today’s
theory as well, it subverts gender and sexual binaries or categories to expose
the limitations of the categories in question. This is to encourage audiences
to reflect on their surroundings and/or the various issues discussed within the
film. After briefing the discussion, let’s leap to the brief introduction about
the film that will be discussed for this paper, Billy’s Hollywood Screen Kiss. Billy’s Hollywood Screen Kiss is a 1998
American gay-themed romantic comedy film, written and directed byTommy O’Haver.
:::SYNOPSIS:::
Billy Collier, an aspiring photographer, was agreed to
finance his Screen Kiss project while encountering a young coffee shop waiter,
Gabriel, at the same time. He had a crush on him due to his cute and charming
look. That night at a party, Billy recruited Gabriel to be his model and the
two of them develop a friendship. Billy could not figure out Gabriel is fully
straight or not, even though Gabriel had a girlfriend in the beginning. After
some days, Gabriel broke up with his girlfriend, while Billy makes tentative
overtures towards him in one night when they are sleeping on the same bed.
Gabriel refused it, and Billy apologized to what he had done. After that, their
closeness seems to become an end, in which Gabriel rejected everything from
Billy in the day of shooting at a beach. At the end, Billy made a big success
on his screening’s exhibition, and he met a guy named Joshua, who admired Billy’s
outwork a lot.
:::OPINION:::
This is my first experience to watch a Queer film, and it
teaches me a lot of things. It shows a subversion out from every romantic
shows, drama or movie, that I have watched in my lifetime. As for myself, I prefer
“special” movies over normal ones, which means that I really enjoy watching
this film because it is different from any romantic shows. Another than that,
this film teach me not just the relationship and life of a non-straight people,
but also give me a sense of reality. In Billy’s
Hollywood Screen Kiss, the ending is over my expectation, for others’ too.
Most of the people will expect good endings in very romance film – two person
be with each other happily forever after, yet this film did not show this
ending. It symbolize the reality, which means that not everything will goes
well. Billy did not get up with Gabriel, this is a sad-yet-over-expect ending.
:::CONCLUSION:::
As a
conclusion, we can observe some elements of Queer Cinema in Billy’s Hollywood Screen Kiss. Through
the elements, film students and audiences can differentiate and know more about
the Queer films. However in some countries, these kind of films still cannot
reach the acceptance from either government or society. Being diverse, I hope
that everyone can give more attention to Queer Cinemas. It’s not just because
for knowing the LGBTQI world or step into their shoes, but also influence the
next generation as well.





Comments
Post a Comment